<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can I make $250,000. per year???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeliebner.com/internet-marketing/how-can-i-make-250000-per-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeliebner.com/internet-marketing/how-can-i-make-250000-per-year/</link>
	<description>The Creative Power of Mike Liebner</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 00:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: shaners</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeliebner.com/internet-marketing/how-can-i-make-250000-per-year/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>shaners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikeliebner.com/internet-marketing/how-can-i-make-250000-per-year/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>HAhahahaha, now that's funny. You'd have to be a hermit and glued to your computer for at least 8 hrs a day. I'm way too lazy for that :-P. Crikey it takes me about 30 mins /page as it is. Using 96 pages/week at my speed. Thats 48hrs. I really don't want to sit at my computer for 48 hrs. I can honestly say I have never quite looked at it that way. I'm only going to assume in that scenario, that the best way to do it is some sort of automated site creator, which by the way exist in ghastly quantities.
No thank you I'll stick with quality content and use legit methods of generating traffic to them. There's way too much garbage out there for my linking. Though on the other hand if you wanted to you could do the product data feed thingy and produce some huge sites fairly fast. Mind you the keyword research and getting sufficient keyword lists might take you a while. Sheesh I can only imagine what the PPC budget would have to be to drive traffic at 5000 pages. But I guess the real answer is YES. Anything is possible, and some people get off on that sort of thing. For me its not probable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAhahahaha, now that&#8217;s funny. You&#8217;d have to be a hermit and glued to your computer for at least 8 hrs a day. I&#8217;m way too lazy for that :-P. Crikey it takes me about 30 mins /page as it is. Using 96 pages/week at my speed. Thats 48hrs. I really don&#8217;t want to sit at my computer for 48 hrs. I can honestly say I have never quite looked at it that way. I&#8217;m only going to assume in that scenario, that the best way to do it is some sort of automated site creator, which by the way exist in ghastly quantities.<br />
No thank you I&#8217;ll stick with quality content and use legit methods of generating traffic to them. There&#8217;s way too much garbage out there for my linking. Though on the other hand if you wanted to you could do the product data feed thingy and produce some huge sites fairly fast. Mind you the keyword research and getting sufficient keyword lists might take you a while. Sheesh I can only imagine what the PPC budget would have to be to drive traffic at 5000 pages. But I guess the real answer is YES. Anything is possible, and some people get off on that sort of thing. For me its not probable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
